Fwd: RE: [tupocc] "Ghetto" Party Stirs Controversy at UT Law School

From: "Kenavon Carter" <carterkenavon@hotmail.com>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:06:03 -0500
Subject: RE: [tupocc] "Ghetto" Party Stirs Controversy at UT Law School

an even better article....

October 16, 2006

"Ghetto Fabulous" Parties: the New Face of White Supremacy

Racism and Cheap Thrills at the University of Texas Law School

By ROBERT JENSEN

When one of the first-year University of Texas law students who participated in a "ghetto fabulous" party posted pictures on the web, we saw the ugly face of white privilege and the racism in which it is rooted. But the depth of the problem of white supremacy at the university -- and in mainstream institutions more generally -- is also evident in the polite way in which the university administration chastised the students.

While the thoughtless actions of young adults acting out the racism of the culture are disturbing, the thoughtful -- but depoliticized -- response from the law school is distressing. The actions of both groups in this affair are a painful reminder of the depth of white society's commitment to white supremacy.

This controversy is not unique to UT. It seems that every year students at a prestigious university -- the University of Chicago last year, Cornell in 2004, and Texas A&M in 2003 -- hold one of these parties, in which white students revel in what they believe to be the appearance and behavior of the black and brown people of the "ghetto."

The student from the UT party who posted the photos has taken them off the web, but news reports describe a party in which the students "carried 40-ounce bottles of malt liquor and wore Afro wigs, necklaces with large medallions and name tags bearing historically black and Hispanic names." No one involved has contested the characterization of the event.

The motivations and views of participants may vary, but these parties have two consistent features:

(1) white people mock African American and Latino people through stereotypes of the residents of low-income urban areas, while at the same time enjoying the feeling of temporarily adopting these looks and poses; and

(2) the white folks typically do it without pausing to ponder what right they have as members of a dominant racial class to poach in this fashion on the lives of people of a subordinated racial class.

In other words, white people find pleasure in insulting non-white people while at the same time safely "slumming" for cheap thrills in that non-white world, all the time oblivious to the moral and political implications.

Also typical in these university controversies is a tepid reaction from administrators, who tend to avoid the contentious race politics at the core of the problem. At UT, the email that went out to all law students from Dean Larry Sager is revealing.

Let me be clear that this critique is not focused on the dean, or any other administrator involved. Sager, who has a distinguished record as a teacher, is a widely recognized constitutional scholar who has published important work on civil liberties, especially freedom of religion. He consulted other administrators and students before communicating to the entire student body, and his commitment to equality and diversity is clear. Still, his characterization of the incident is troubling.

The email to students doesn't use the terms "racism" or "white supremacy." The only reference to the racial politics of "ghetto fabulous" is the description of the party as being "named in a way that was easily understood to have negative racial overtones" and a reminder that being "racially insensitive" is inappropriate. While many of the students at the party may not have thought they were being racist, it's essential that we name such activities as rooted in white people's sense of privilege and entitlement, the result of historical and contemporary racism in a white-supremacist culture.

This language is crucial. Even with the gains of the civil-rights movement, U.S. society is still white supremacist in material terms (there are deep, enduring racialized disparities in measures of wealth and well-being, some of which haven't improved in the past four decades) and ideology (many white people continue to believe that the culture and politics of Europe are inherently superior). To pretend that things such as a ghetto party are not rooted in those racist realities is to ignore fundamental moral and political issues in an unjust society. It's not about "negative racial overtones" -- it's about racism, whether conscious or not. It's not about being "racially insensitive" -- it's about support for white supremacy, whether intended or not.

The dean's email to law students goes on to give three reasons the party was "thoughtless."

First, Sager suggests that some students "might be seriously offended by the party, and especially by the pictures taken at the event." No doubt many people were offended, and we all should avoid unnecessary offense to others. But the key problem is not that such images are offensive but that they are part of an oppressive system of white supremacy. In a pluralist society, we all can expect to be offended by some things other people say and do. Such offense becomes an important political issue when connected to the ways in which some people are systematically devalued and discriminated against.

Racist, sexist, and heterosexist images and words are a problem not merely because they offend but because they help keep non-white people, women, and lesbians and gays in subordinated positions. Framing the problem of oppressive systems as a question of offensiveness often leads people to argue that the solution is for the targets of the offensive speech or actions to be less sensitive, rather than changing the oppressive system. Sager's email doesn't suggest that, but it could play into that common feeling among people in the dominant classes. We live in a world in which the legitimate concerns of non-white people about racist expression and actions are often met by white people saying, "Stop whining -- get over it." In such a world, white people trying to resist racism should be careful not to do anything that could contribute to that.

Second, the email suggests that the partygoers didn't consider "the potential harm they were causing to UT Law" by doing something that could make some people "feel uncomfortable simply because of who they are." Most would agree that it's important at a public institution of higher education for all people to feel accepted as part of the university community, but the real harm is not to the institution but to the people who are targeted. By highlighting the effect of this on "UT Law," Sager risks elevating the institution above the principles involved and may well leave people wondering if the university isn't worried most about its image.

Finally, and most important, the dean's message warns the partygoers that they failed to consider "the extraordinary damage they could do to their own careers" in a society in which those who employ lawyers might not want to hire people who engage in such conduct. Sager warns that it is "genuinely foolhardy to engage in conduct (and even more foolhardy to proudly disseminate proof that you have done so) that could jeopardize your ability to practice law." That's certainly true, though it's also true there are many places in Texas (and around the country) where the good old boys in power would find no problem with this kind of "harmless fun." There are no doubt lots of practicing attorneys who enjoy similar kinds of fun themselves.

But whatever the case, should we be stressing to students that the reason they should not be white supremacists is that it might hurt their careers? What does such a message convey to students and to the community?

What's missing in this official response is a clear statement that these law students -- many of whom go on to join the ranks of the powerful who run society -- have engaged in behavior that is overtly racist. Whatever their motivations in planning or attending the party, they have demonstrated that they have internalized a white-supremacist ideology. When these students are making future decisions in business, government, and education, how will such white supremacy manifest itself? And who will be hurt by that?

Here's what we should say to students: The problem with a racist "ghetto fabulous" party isn't that it offends some people or tarnishes the image of UT or may hurt careers. The problem is that it's racist, and when you engage in such behavior you are deepening the racism of a white-supremacist culture, and that's wrong. It violates the moral and political principles that we all say we endorse. It supports and strengthens an unjust social system that hurts people.

These incidents, and the universities' responses, also raise a fundamental question about what we white people mean when we say we support "diversity." Does that mean we are willing to invite some limited number of non-white people into our space, but with the implicit understanding that it will remain a white-defined space? Or does it mean a commitment to changing these institutions into truly multicultural places? If we're serious about that, it has to mean not an occasional nod to other cultural practices, but an end to white-supremacist practices. It has to mean not only acknowledging other cultural practices but recognizing that the wealth of the United States and Europe is rooted in the destruction of some of those cultures over the past 500 years, and that we are living with the consequences of that destruction.

We white people can't simply point to the ugliest racism of the KKK as the problem and feel morally superior. We can't issue a polite warning to a few law students about being thoughtless and think we've done our job. The problem is that most of us white people -- myself included -- are comfortable in white spaces, and we often are reflexively hesitant to surrender control of that space. Real change -- the process of truly incorporating a deep multiculturalism into our schools, churches, and businesses -- is a long struggle. The more I make some progress in my own classes, for example, the more I see how much I have left to do and the more aware of my mistakes I become.

An easy place to start is by clearly marking racist actions for what they are -- expressions of white people's sense of entitlement and privilege that are rooted in a white-supremacist system. We can start by saying -- unequivocally, in blunt language -- that such racism is morally wrong, that white supremacy is morally wrong, and that we white people have an obligation to hold ourselves and each other accountable until we have created a truly just multiracial society.

We'll know we are there not when white people have stopped throwing ghetto parties, but when we have built a world in which there are no ghettos.

We have a long way to go.

Robert Jensen is a journalism professor at the University of Texas at Austin and a member of the board of the Third Coast Activist Resource Center. He is the author of The Heart of Whiteness: Race, Racism, and White Privilege and Citizens of the Empire: The Struggle to Claim Our Humanity. He can be reached at rjensen@uts.cc.utexas.edu.

---

From:  "Carlos Villarreal" <carlos@nlgsf.org>
Reply-To:  tupocc@yahoogroups.com
To:  tupocc@yahoogroups.com
Subject:  [tupocc] "Ghetto" Party Stirs Controversy at UT Law School
Date:  Mon, 16 Oct 2006 11:58:35 -0700 (PDT)
>'Ghetto' party photos stir controversy at UT law school
>
>Dean admonishes students to 'think twice' and consider possible
>consequences to their careers in the future.
>
>By Ralph K.M. Haurwitz
>AMERICAN-STATESMAN STAFF
>Friday, October 13, 2006
>
>The dean of the School of Law at the University of Texas has urged
>students to "think twice" and "think twice again" about their future
>conduct after the Internet posting of photographs taken at an
>off-campus party organized around a "ghetto" theme.
>
>The photos showed the students holding 40-ounce bottles in brown
>paper bags and wearing Afro wigs, gold teeth and such gang-related
>attire as bandanas, according to students who saw the images. Some of
>the party-goers wore name tags with names such as "Tanika" or "Jesus"
>to play on a black or Hispanic stereotype, the students said. The
>photos are no longer online.
>
>UT Law Dean Larry Sager sent an e-mail to all law students last week
>asserting that the party "was easily understood to have negative
>racial overtones." In addition, he wrote, such behavior risks damage
>to the law school's reputation and to the career prospects of the
>students involved.

>
>"Should the possibility of this sort of conduct present itself,
>please, please think twice," Sager wrote. "And then think twice
>again."
>
>The dean met this week with about 20 students who attended the party,
>which was not sanctioned by the law school.
>
>"This is not an occasion of discipline but of education," Sager said
>Thursday. "I would say their widely expressed sentiment is an
>insistence on the innocence of their mind-set and an agreement that
>it was foolish and something they regret."
>
>Race relations at UT - and at the law school in particular - have
>been a sensitive matter for many years. Blacks were barred from
>admission to the law school until the U.S. Supreme Court ordered a
>black man admitted in 1950. In recent years, an outdoor statue of
>civil rights leader Martin Luther King Jr. has been vandalized twice.
>
>About 70 of UT's roughly 1,300 law students are black, according to
>preliminary enrollment figures from the university. There are about
>800 white students, 225 Hispanic students, 75 Asian students, 55
>foreign students and 75 whose ethnicities were unknown.
>
>Several students of various races and ethnicities said the party and
>photos reflect negatively on the law school and its students.
>
>"I thought it was insensitive," said Iman Houston, a law student who
>is a member of the Thurgood Marshall Legal Society, a group
>representing African American law students, and who serves on the
>executive board of the National Black Law Students Association.
>"Given the inflammatory past of this law school, we have to be
>conscious of the image we portray to the community."
>
>Theme parties have stirred controversy at other schools as well.
>Students at Baylor University wore tank tops, visors and bandanas at
>an "E-Dawg" party in September. E-Dawg is the name of a black rapper.
>
>Some UT law students didn't find the ghetto party troubling. Rodolfo
>Segura, a first-year law student who is Mexican American, said
>get-togethers built around a theme - including "pimp and ho" parties,
>where attendees dress as pimps or prostitutes - are fairly common
>among college students of various races and ethnicities.
>
>Sager said he didn't think the episode reflects underlying racial or
>ethnic tension at the law school, whose student body has become more
>diverse in recent years, thanks in part to recruiting by
>administrators.
>
>"There may be aspects of popular culture with which students are
>surrounded which nevertheless can be very injurious to fellow
>students, the school and their own careers," the dean said. "In that
>sense, this is a potentially useful educational moment."
>
>rhaurwitz@statesman.com; 445-3604
>
>Additional material from The Associated Press.
>
>---
>
>  From the Texan:
>
>Law students' party theme not so fabulous
>
>Michelle West
>
>Posted: 10/13/06
>
>   Photographs from a "ghetto fabulous"-themed party prompted reaction
>from the dean of the University's School of Law and a law student
>organization.
>
>   The photographs, which depict first-year law students sporting Afro
>wigs, large necklaces with medallions and name-tags with fake
>historically black or Hispanic names while holding 40-ounce bottles
>of malt liquor, were brought to the attention of the law school
>dean's office by members of the Thurgood Marshall Legal Society.
>
>   Members of the society, which serves as the University's chapter of
>the National Black Law Students Association, viewed the party images
>on the Web site of a student who had attended the party, said
>president Sophia Lecky.
>
>   "I would definitely say that the party was thoughtless and just
>inappropriate," Lecky said. "They were kind of irresponsible for the
>feeling of others."
>
>   Law School Dean Lawrence Sager, along with Vice President for
>Diversity Gregory Vincent, met with about 18 students who attended
>the party. Sager told The Associated Press he didn't believe the
>students were malicious or racially motivated and no disciplinary
>action would be taken.
>
>   Sager did, however, send an e-mail to the student body of the law
>school reprimanding the actions of those involved.

>
>   "No firm or agency at this point in our history would knowingly hire
>a candidate whose conduct was racially insensitive," Sager said in
>the Oct. 6 e-mail. "It is genuinely foolhardy to engage in conduct
>(and even more foolhardy to proudly disseminate proof that you have
>done so) that could jeopardize your ability to practice law."
>
>   Members of the student law organization posted a photograph of
>another similarly themed party in the atrium of the law school
>Wednesday afternoon. The photo was of a previous UT student party.
>Next to the photo, the legal society posted a letter expressing its
>disappointment concerning the actions.
>
>   "We wanted to explain why certain groups of people may be offended
>by images that were personified in the party," Lecky said of the
>display.
>
>   Lecky said she does not think the incident was indicative of the law
>school environment overall, nor does she think the students involved
>had a negative racial motivation.
>
>   "I would not say that racist behavior is common at the law school;
>we're not of that opinion at all," Lecky said. "Overall, I'm very
>proud of TMLS, of the actions of the law school administration and
>feedback for the students. We're satisfied with the end result of
>this. I think that we're all a better law school community because of
>it."
>
>   Additional reporting by The Associated Press.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>Yahoo! Groups Links
>
><*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tupocc/
>
><*> Your email settings:
>     Individual Email | Traditional
>
><*> To change settings online go to:
>     http://groups.yahoo.com/group/tupocc/join
>     (Yahoo! ID required)
>
><*> To change settings via email:
>     mailto:tupocc-digest@yahoogroups.com
>     mailto:tupocc-fullfeatured@yahoogroups.com
>
><*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
>     tupocc-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com
>
><*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
>     http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
>
>
>

__._,_.___

Messages in this topic (2) Reply (via web post) | Start a new topic

Messages | Files | Photos | Links | Database | Polls | Members | Calendar

Change settings via the Web (Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest | Switch format to Traditional
Visit Your Group | Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use | Unsubscribe

Recent Activity

 2

New Members

Visit Your Group

SPONSORED LINKS

• Civil right lawyer
• Civil rights
• Civil right attorney
• Civil right attorney california
• Nlg

Yahoo! TV

Want the scoop?

Check out today's

news and gossip.

Y! Toolbar

Get it Free!

easy 1-click access

to your groups.

Yahoo! Groups

Start a group

in 3 easy steps.

Connect with others.

.

__,_._,___