http://www.usatoday.com/news/nation/2007-03-30-census-role_N.htm
 
 Papers show Census role in WWII camps
 
 By Haya El Nasser, USA TODAY
 
  The Census Bureau turned over confidential information including names and 
addresses to help the Justice Department, Secret Service and other agencies 
identify Japanese-Americans during World War II, according to government 
documents released today.
 
   Documents found by two historians in Commerce Department archives and the 
Franklin D. Roosevelt Presidential Library confirm for the first time that the 
bureau shared details about individual Japanese-Americans after Japan's Dec. 7, 
1941, attack on Pearl Harbor. 
  The Census Bureau played a role in the confinement of more than 100,000 
Americans of Japanese descent who were rounded up and held in internment camps,
 
many until the war ended in 1945. In 1942, the Census turned over general 
statistics about where Japanese-Americans lived to the War Department. It was 
acting legally under the Second War Powers Act, which allowed the sharing of 
information for national security. 
  The newly released documents show that in 1943, the Census complied with a 
request by the Treasury Department to turn over names of individuals of Japanese 
ancestry in the Washington, D.C., area because of an unspecified threat against 
President Franklin Roosevelt. The list contained names, addresses and data on 
the age, sex, citizenship status and occupation of Japanese-Americans in the 
area. 
  "The issue is how ethical is it to use the Census to target people," says 
William Seltzer, a statistician at Fordham University in New York who co-wrote 
the report with Margo Anderson, professor of history and urban studies at the 
University of
 Wisconsin-Milwaukee. Sharing the information was not illegal, he 
says, but "it was ethically questionable." 
 Disclosure was legal 
  The Census Bureau's role in helping the government ferret out 
Japanese-Americans during the war has been documented in previous research by 
Seltzer and Anderson and others. But today's report marks the first time that 
documents have been uncovered indicating that the agency released actual names. 
  The Census Bureau has consistently denied releasing such names probably 
because, over time, most officials there didn't know it had happened, Seltzer 
says. 
  The agency has "not had the opportunity to review" today's report, says 
Christa Jones, chief of Census' policy office. "The disclosure of the names was 
legal at that time," Jones says. "One of the most important things for us is to 
remind everyone that the law is very different today." 
  Census activities during World War
 II "obviously go against their own mandate 
for confidentiality," says Terry Ao, director of census and voting programs at 
the Asian American Justice Center, a civil rights group. 
  "Actions such as this have the potential of having a very serious detrimental 
impact on the ability of the Census Bureau to collect data that we need. The 
most important thing about this would be that the (agency) today understands it 
has no authority to conduct such activity. They do take their legal obligations 
for confidentiality very seriously. " 
   The Census every 10 years asks Americans to fill out detailed questionnaires 
that probe everything from their income and household relationships to 
occupation, race and ethnicity. The information is used to allocate federal 
funds and congressional seats, draw political districts, track changes in family 
size and plan for roads and schools. 
  Questions about questions 
  The
 report by Seltzer and Anderson comes as a revelation to Kenneth Prewitt, a 
public affairs professor at Columbia University in New York City who was Census 
director during the 2000 Census. 
  Seven years ago, Prewitt dealt with controversy over Census questionnaires. 
Then-Senate majority leader Trent Lott, R-Miss., urged people to skip any Census 
questions they felt violated their privacy. The objections were exacerbated by 
previous research by Seltzer and Anderson on the Census' role in the internment 
of Japanese-Americans. 
  Prewitt apologized for what the bureau had done, something no Census official 
had done previously. He calls the new report "a remarkable piece of historical 
detective work" but is saddened by the findings because the Census prides itself 
on keeping all information confidential. 
  "It is better to know than to not know," he says. "Knowing the facts will 
redouble the effort to assure it is
 not repeated." 
  After the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Congress approved the USA Patriot Act to 
give the government broad investigative powers. Since then, civil liberties 
groups have criticized government efforts to monitor phone calls, prepare no-fly 
lists and keep files on anti-war activists. 
  "It's a bombshell," Caroline Fredrickson, director of the ACLU's Washington 
Legislative Office, says of today's disclosures. "This is such a black mark on 
American history that we need to make sure we never allow ourselves to engage in 
anything close to that kind of violation of people's constitutional rights." 
  An ethical issue was raised in 2004 when the Census turned over information it 
had collected about Arab-Americans by ZIP code but not by name. The information 
was already public but civil rights groups protested the agency's handing over 
of data to Homeland Security. The Census now puts all requests for sensitive
 
data through a rigorous approval process and makes all special releases of data 
available to the public.
 
  Copyright 2007 USA TODAY
LEGAL ACTIVISTS OF COLOR
News, Events, Actions and Commentary on law and social justice. Welcome to the official blog of the United People of Color Caucus (TUPOCC) of the National Lawyers Guild.
News, Events, Actions and Commentary on law and social justice. Welcome to the official blog of the United People of Color Caucus (TUPOCC) of the National Lawyers Guild.
Saturday, March 31, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
  


No comments:
Post a Comment